“DRAFT” Phase III Steering Committee & Secretariat
Workplan
(January-December 2010)
Southwest N.B. Marine Resources Planning “Preferred Future
of the Bay” Document |
| Recommended Actions from Steering Committee |
Workplan Objectives, Actions (Secretariat Lead with
Steering Committee Direction) and Outcomes (For Steering Committee Consideration) |
Recommendations |
Objectives |
Actions |
Outcomes |
1-1 – Create a “Marine Planning Advisory Council” comprised
of stakeholders to provide advice on marine development and applications
to current regulatory authorities. |
Objectives: (a) Understanding existing government
processes (e.g., public input and transparency in decision-making) and
identify opportunities for improvement or enhancement. (b)Define
more clearly the practical aspects of the Advisory Council. Address
the questions that governments had regarding the Advisory Council. |
Action: Review of existing government processes (including
committees) for public input, transparency and efficiency.
Details on how the AC would be set up: - roles and responsibilities
-organize a workshop
-discuss changes in decision-making |
Outcome: Greater awareness of government decision-making
processes.
Draft of structure (roles & responsibilities) of the AC (what it would
look like).
Greater efficiency in existing processes. |
1-4 – Develop a process to expand and apply
the Community Values Criteria (CVC) derived from consultations |
Objectives: (a) identify
next steps to complete and make it functional (e.g. weighted criteria),
(b) Identify practical ways of incorporating into existing processes and/or
a proposed advisory council, (c) a process for community input (e.g. periodic
review), and (d) the applicability of criteria across all activities, and
the use of the CVC in management scenario comparison. |
Action: Develop more
details on the CVC (e.g. scalability and indicators).
Obtain community input and agreement on the CVC.
Organize a workshop involving provincial and federal permitting agencies
to assess the CVC. How will it be used in decision making?
How will the CVC be used and updated?
Review experience and processes from other jurisdictions. |
Outcome: A CVC that
reflects community values and can be used to reflect these values in decision
making. |
Recommendations |
Objectives |
Actions |
Outcomes |
1-6 – Create a Communications & Knowledge
Transfer Framework, which will enhance current consultation
processes and improve public/community participation. |
Objective: Enhance
public participation and input into, as well as public knowledge and
values and understanding of, government review and decision-making processes. |
Action: Organize
a workshop. Coordinate the review of options for moving forward
(e.g., contract) with a review of existing processes and identification
of best potential options. DFO to continue work on a project
on a regional web portal related to integrated management, which could
assist with this objective (e.g. use of MRP as a pilot). |
Outcome: Recommend an enhanced
communication framework/strategy. |
2-1 – Incorporate the use of community planning
tools (e.g., local visioning workshops) and science (e.g., ecologically
and biologically sensitive areas, zones of influence models) and ecosystem
based management tools (e.g., Marine Protected Areas, Zones) to protect
critical & unique habitats supported by the public |
Objective: Identify
ecologically and biologically significant areas within the marine planning
area as a first step towards the identification of unique and
critical areas to be considered for protection. It is acknowledged
that economic, social and cultural considerations also need to be included
as subsequent steps.
Identify what the community considers as an important area. |
Action: A SC meeting
in 2010 with federal/provincial agencies to review the Ecologically and
Biologically Sensitive Areas (EBSA) criteria. Organize
a Workshop? |
Outcome: Identification
of an inclusive process of defining important, ecologically and biologically
significant areas within the planning area and understanding of the identification
criteria.
A list of ecologically and biologically significant areas. |
4-6 – Provide an updated economic value
of marine related resources in the planning area. |
Objective: Update
the marine economic value report for New Brunswick (Gulf Region and Bay
of Fundy). |
Action: A representative
from the SC participates in the oversight of the Request For Proposals. |
Outcome: Updated marine
economic value report for New Brunswick. |